EU Parliament adopts negotiating position for AI Omnibus
The EU Parliament committees LIBE and IMCO have adopted their negotiating position for the AI Omnibus, a proposal to simplify and extend compliance deadlines for the AI Act.
What happened?
On 15 November 2023, the EU Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) adopted their negotiating position for the AI Omnibus. This package concerns the European Commission's proposal to simplify the AI Act and extend the deadlines for compliance. The decision paves the way for final negotiations with the Council later in November 2023.
Key facts
”Today’s adoption paves the way for final interinstitutional negotiations with the Council later this month.”
”Setting realistic implementation deadlines is essential for the successful rollout of the AI Act.”
”CCIA Europe welcomes the co-legislators’ alignment on delaying the application of high-risk AI rules until December 2027 and August 2028, reflecting the systemic delays in the delivery of technical specifications needed for compliance.”
Why it matters
The adoption of the negotiating position is a key step towards the final design of the AI Act and its implementation. Extended deadlines, particularly for high-risk AI, are considered necessary due to delays in the development of technical specifications required for compliance. Industry organisations such as CCIA Europe emphasise the importance of a swift agreement and simplification.
Who is affected?
The decision primarily affects AI developers and companies using AI systems within the EU. These actors will now receive clearer conditions and potentially more time to adapt to upcoming regulations. Users of AI systems are also indirectly affected, as the regulatory framework aims to ensure safety and reliability.
Impact on the EU
This is a central development within the EU's AI regulation. Although the original proposal came from the European Commission, the Parliament's adoption of the negotiating position is the latest step. The proposed extended deadlines aim to facilitate implementation across the entire EU area, with a view to a single market.
What else you should know
CCIA Europe has urged lawmakers to be pragmatic and consider a longer deadline (12 months instead of the proposed grace period) for the labelling of generative AI under Article 50(2), as well as addressing the labelling requirements in Article 50(4). This indicates ongoing discussions regarding practical feasibility.
Quick answers about this story
Vad har hänt?
När hände det?
Varför spelar det roll?
Vilka deadlines berörs?
The link opens in a new window and leads to the publisher's own site.
Källan har spårats automatiskt från utgivaren via Aheadlines signalkedja.
AI-verktyg i artikeln
Topics
Get similar news straight to your inbox
The reader's room
Send in a question or an addition. The newsroom reads everything before it's published and replies when relevant. No AI-generated text – just people.
Sign in to submit a comment or question.
Read the article through your role
- Decide whether this affects strategy over 6–12 months or is just noise.
- Discuss with leadership: do we own the right question or does ownership need to move?
- Ask: what risk are we taking by NOT acting on this this quarter?
Generated angle — not editorial analysis of "EU Parliament adopts negotiating position for AI Omnibus"