Skip to content
Policy & Reglering· Policy

Sharp Criticism Against Commission’s Final Draft Code of Practice for EU AI Act

Civil society and Members of the European Parliament are directing sharp criticism at the European Commission’s final draft code of practice for the EU AI Act, arguing that requirements have been diluted following pressure from big tech companies.

By the Aheadline editorial team·4 okt. 2026·2 min read·Source: Entity-watch: EU AI ActVerifierad signalAI-generated
Sharp Criticism Against Commission’s Final Draft Code of Practice for EU AI Act
Sharp Criticism Against Commission’s Final Draft Code of Practice for EU AI Act
By · Policy- & EU-reporter
Last updated
Vad betyder det för mig?

What happened?

Civil society organisations and Members of the European Parliament are directing harsh criticism at the third and final draft of the code of practice intended to guide the implementation of the EU AI Act. The draft was presented by the European Commission’s AI Office on 11 March following a series of workshops with AI providers. The final deadline to submit feedback and comments on the draft is 30 March.

Key facts

Sista kommentardatum30 mars
Publiceringsdatum utkast11 mars
Utkast i ordningenTredje och sista

Why it matters

The code of practice is critical as it establishes the framework for how the requirements of the EU AI Act are to be interpreted in practice by AI developers. Civil society and the MEPs who drafted the law believe the Commission’s latest draft gives in to lobbying by major tech companies, risking a weakening of transparency and safety requirements.

Who is affected?

The criticism involves developers of general-purpose AI models (GPAI providers), MEPs, and civil society organisations focused on digital rights and consumer privacy. Large tech companies have lobbied for a more limited scope for the code, while rights groups argue that the regulations are being diluted.

Impact on the EU

The final draft of the code of practice is being developed by the European Commission’s AI Office and aims to guide compliance with requirements for general-purpose AI (GPAI) models under the EU AI Act. According to the article published in October 2026, the final process regarding the practical application of the regulations across the union is currently underway.

What else you should know

The date in the source text body specifies March 2025, while the article’s publication date is 3 October 2026. The process regarding the codes of practice has involved several working groups and provider workshops to balance industry interests against the demands of civil society.

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers about this story

Vad har hänt?
Civilsamhällesorganisationer och EU-parlamentariker har framfört stark kritik mot det tredje och sista utkastet till uppförandekoden ("code of practice") för EU AI Act, då de anser att kraven urvattnats till förmån för storbolagen.
När hände det?
Det tredje utkastet lades fram den 11 mars av EU-kommissionens AI Office, med en frist för synpunkter till den 30 mars. Artikeln som rapporterade om kritiken publicerades den 3 oktober 2026.
Varför spelar det roll?
Uppförandekoden styr hur lagen praktiskt tillämpas för AI-modeller. En svagare kod kan leda till lägre kraven på transparens, säkerhet och riskhantering för stora AI-aktörer i EU.
Påverkar det EU?
Ja, uppförandekoden täcker alla AI-aktörer som tillhandahåller generella AI-modeller på den europeiska marknaden.
Original source
Entity-watch: EU AI Act·insideaipolicy.com

The link opens in a new window and leads to the publisher's own site.

Verifierad signal

Källan har spårats automatiskt från utgivaren via Aheadlines signalkedja.

AI-verktyg i artikeln

Topics

#AI Act
[ STAY UP TO DATE ]

Get similar news straight to your inbox

No affiliate linksCancel anytimeGDPR-friendly
[ Frequency ]
[ What do you want to read about? ]

You'll receive updates on 2 topics.

The reader's room

Send in a question or an addition. The newsroom reads everything before it's published and replies when relevant. No AI-generated text – just people.

Sign in to submit a comment or question.

Loading comments…
How this affects you

Read the article through your role

  • Decide whether this affects strategy over 6–12 months or is just noise.
  • Discuss with leadership: do we own the right question or does ownership need to move?
  • Ask: what risk are we taking by NOT acting on this this quarter?

Generated angle — not editorial analysis of "Sharp Criticism Against Commission’s Final Draft Code of Pra"